Sally-Anne Perks (
alt_sally_anne) wrote2011-04-01 12:25 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
That is NOT GREGORY.
There is no way. Gregory wouldn't know what half those words meant, let alone how to spell them.
I hope he doesn't get in horrible trouble. Not that I especially like him, but -- do you suppose he dropped his journal as he was getting off the train?
There is no way. Gregory wouldn't know what half those words meant, let alone how to spell them.
I hope he doesn't get in horrible trouble. Not that I especially like him, but -- do you suppose he dropped his journal as he was getting off the train?
no subject
Maybe MLE had Mr Goyle hand over Greg's journal so they could pretend it was stolen and write this. Maybe the magic they talk about doesn't work at ALL but they reckon since they said 'don't try to use a stolen wand! BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN!' they'll blunt the effects of any muggleborns who DO try to rebel. Instead they'll have people practicing these spells and maybe they'll catch them at it.
Smith thinks it's all a laugh, like the world's most complicated April Fool's joke ever.
I suppose we could try out the wandless magic -- there's no rule against a wizard or witch learning to do 'Accio' without a wand. And then think how easy it would be to learn it next year with one! If it works, at all, we'll know this wasn't MLE because they'd never give useful information out like this. If they did write something like this, it would all be rot.
no subject
A really dangerous one.
Who would know about wandless magic who could tell us if it'd be safe to try, or if it is right? I'd bet Professor Brutka would tell us.
And I think the worse thing that could happen would be that nothing would happen at all... but just in case, I wouldn't want to try it before I'd heard one way or the other.
no subject
Maybe we can buttonhole him next time he's over for dinner and ask.
no subject
I think Professor Brutka would be a good one to ask, too, but not in the journals and I won't see him until I get back to school.
no subject
But if enough Muggleborns read this and try it...wow!
no subject
I mean, so far as I know. I suppose maybe the same people you got your wands from gave her one, it's not as if she has any way to tell me.
I don't know if she'd take one, though. She was always really careful about following rules because she was so afraid of what would happen to me if she didn't. But if this worked --
Imagine the camps. If everyone learned how to do wandless magic. For a week in our defense club Pansy and I worked on things that aren't meant to be hexes but can work that way, and 'accio' is definitely a charm that could be used offensively. 'Accio' on something someone's standing on, so they fall down. 'Accio' on something heavy you can throw, or if someone's grabbed you, 'accio' on something heavy and you dodge right as it's flying at the both of you...
no subject
Wouldn't they figure they'd get up to mischief? Like trying to figure out to do magic without wands?
I guess. I just think wouldn't they all be using it already if it was something they could really learn just by trying wand spells without wands?
no subject
no subject
D'you think it works? Wandless magic? I mean not just wild magic like little kids have, but really doing proper spells?
D'you think you could learn to do it if you'd never been taught Charms at all? With a wand, I mean.
I've sort of been trying, but I can't make it work at all. Yet. But it would snitch if we could get the hang of it. It'd be great in duelling club--if someone captured your wand, you could still fight.
no subject
Maybe we'd be better at it because we've only had our wands for three years?
no subject